| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 10 post(s) |
Primary This Rifter
4S Corporation
Goonswarm Federation
49
   |
Posted - 2014.08.05 04:48:00 -
[1] - Quote
Sticky This Thread
Alt of [redacted on advice from a reputable internet spaceships lawyer] |
Primary This Rifter
4S Corporation
Goonswarm Federation
338
|
Posted - 2014.12.12 02:57:45 -
[2] - Quote
It disgusts me that our CSM reps not only took this lying down, they didn't even seem to really give a ****.
Yeah, Sion Kumitomo. Yeah, mynnna. I'm looking at you. What the hell's the matter with you?
Alt of [redacted on advice from a reputable internet spaceships lawyer]
|
Primary This Rifter
4S Corporation
Goonswarm Federation
338
|
Posted - 2014.12.12 03:01:38 -
[3] - Quote
Having a watermark on every alliance logo is stupid, especially if you have it on ships. It's going to look stupid. And furthermore it's completely unnecessary.
Why can't you see that CCP was just trying to stall on this subject long enough to get you to agree with it just so you can get the submission process working again?
Alt of [redacted on advice from a reputable internet spaceships lawyer]
|
Primary This Rifter
4S Corporation
Goonswarm Federation
411
|
Posted - 2014.12.31 15:34:48 -
[4] - Quote
This is just ******* sad.
Reminder: CCP thinks you have no right to your alliance logos.
|
Primary This Rifter
4S Corporation
Goonswarm Federation
411
|
Posted - 2014.12.31 15:38:09 -
[5] - Quote
I'm really not sure whether to be mad at CCP or sad for them at this point but I do feel pretty confident in saying that your legal team is laughing at you behind your backs.
Reminder: CCP thinks you have no right to your alliance logos.
|
Primary This Rifter
4S Corporation
Goonswarm Federation
479
|
Posted - 2015.01.17 01:02:09 -
[6] - Quote
Permanent, non-exclusive, irrevocable license with permission to use and distribute.
No transfer of copyright. No watermarks. No compromise.
Reminder: CCP thinks you have no right to your alliance logos.
|
Primary This Rifter
4S Corporation
Goonswarm Federation
491
|
Posted - 2015.01.22 02:00:44 -
[7] - Quote
Akrasjel Lanate wrote:CSM 9 Winter Summit - Day One Meeting MinutesQuote:CCP Seagull then talked about how using some kind of ingame tool to create logos or skin deisgns would likely be the next probable step in that direction rather than direct player submissions
No.
**** that.
****. That. Entirely.
Such a mechanic would take away the variety and flavor of current alliance logos and replace them with the same kind of generic **** that makes our corporation logos.
Reminder: CCP thinks you have no right to your alliance logos.
|
Primary This Rifter
4S Corporation
Goonswarm Federation
588
|
Posted - 2015.02.18 02:16:36 -
[8] - Quote
Nolan Kotulan wrote:Dani Maulerant wrote:Akrasjel Lanate wrote:To judge i would have to see the amount of option such "tool" would provide. Probably what's in the corporation logo toolset, +25% more of those cookie cutter layer options, and then 4 more color options. Also, I would believe I am speaking for everyone on that proposed option when I say " Nobody wants that!" Show me where the masses were clamoring for an alliance identify maker that was just a clone of the corp logo maker. Show me!!! No, you aren't talking for everyone! I precisely WANT exactly a tool like this! Not one that looks like the actual corp one of course, but a good modern one, with a lot of templates, shapes, colors, typos, etc. I want some lore friendly stuff, not that kind of crapy kid's drawings that are actually in game!
Nobody cares.
Reminder: CCP thinks you have no right to your alliance logos.
|
Primary This Rifter
4S Corporation
Goonswarm Federation
787
|
Posted - 2015.03.19 22:33:25 -
[9] - Quote
The watermark looks just as dumb as I thought it would. |
Primary This Rifter
4S Corporation
Goonswarm Federation
787
|
Posted - 2015.03.20 01:31:38 -
[10] - Quote
CCP thinks that Pepsi will be okay with me putting their logo on **** and calling it my own intellectual property if I scratch it up and put my own logo right next to it. Because that's their logic.
It's ******* stupid and so is whoever thought of this. |
Primary This Rifter
4S Corporation
Goonswarm Federation
787
|
Posted - 2015.04.01 12:18:46 -
[11] - Quote
Neither of those are acceptable options. |
Primary This Rifter
4S Corporation
Goonswarm Federation
787
|
Posted - 2015.04.01 12:41:51 -
[12] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:Primary This Rifter wrote:Neither of those are acceptable options. so whats your solution?
A universal, assignable, irrevocable and royalty-free license to use.
It's an even better solution for CCP than CCP's own solution, considering in many (most?) jurisdictions their proposal doesn't actually solve any of the problems they're claiming it does. A derivative work doesn't suddenly resolve the issues with using somebody else's intellectual property. |
Primary This Rifter
4S Corporation
Goonswarm Federation
787
|
Posted - 2015.04.01 12:50:34 -
[13] - Quote
You didn't even read what I said, did you? |
Primary This Rifter
4S Corporation
Goonswarm Federation
787
|
Posted - 2015.04.01 12:52:41 -
[14] - Quote
Lan Wang wrote:and who exactly gets a royalty free license?
The uploader would be the one granting CCP the license. |
| |
|